![]() We will start with the petitioners, they are the students who asked the Court for review. Here is the procedure we will follow today. Our job now is to review the record and make sure that everything was done properly, then we will make the final determination on what the Constitution says and means in this case. We have reviewed all of that in the court records. The students have now brought their case to the Supreme Court of the United States.īecause this is an appellate hearing, there is no witness testimony, and no evidence is presented. ![]() On appeal, a tie vote in the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals meant that the trial court’s decision in favor of the school district would stand. This is a case that was decided by the trial court in favor of the school district. THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE UNITED STATES OPENS THE HEARING: Today, we will hear oral arguments in the case of Tinker v. The rest of the students are journalists who take notes and give a live television report summarizing the key points made by each side and announcing the decision.ĭebriefing: Read and Discuss the Majority and Dissenting Opinions (15 minutes) They are eight Associate Justices and one Chief Justice two attorneys for the petitioner (student protesters) and two attorneys for the respondent (school district). There are speaking roles for 13 students. This activity can be conducted in a federal courtroom with a judge presiding, or in a classroom with the teacher presiding. To what extent should schools be able to restrict students’ freedom of expression on campus? They will assume the roles of attorneys and Supreme Court justices in a realistic simulation of oral arguments before the highest court in the land. In this simulation of a Supreme Court oral argument, students will gain insights into the key issues considered by the court in deciding Tinker v. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |